Genesis Theory
Personal observations and anomalous experiences
This section retains four experiences that the author uses in the formulation of TUS. For clarity, three planes are separated: the experience itself, the author's interpretation and the relationship to the model.
Methodological note: Personal observations are a genesis hypothesis, not an automatic confirmation. The preface explains the difference between experience, interpretation and independent verification. Preface / How to read TUS →
Methodological rule: the intensity or persuasion of the experience is not alone by measuring the mechanism. The record is worth experience; the mechanism remains a separate issue.
Content:
Appendix A: Personal observations and the emergence of TUS hypotheses
A record of experiences and their systemic interpretations from the observer's perspective
Preliminary provisions
This appendix records four subjective anomalous experiences that influenced the development of TUS. They are not independent evidence for the proposed mechanism. Their value lies in allowing the experience itself, its later interpretation and its relationship to the systemic model to be examined separately.
TUS describes these experiences in informational and systemic terms. This language is the author's interpretation, not a measurement of consciousness independent of the brain or evidence of a multidimensional structure of reality. Psychological, neurobiological, memory-based and situational explanations remain open and must be assessed separately from the intensity of the experience itself.
Anomaly I: Local spatial information sharing (Bird information network in our reality)
- Induction: Deep synchronization meditation, deliberate zeroing of internal 3D acoustic and visual noise.
- Description of the phenomenon: The observer was in the vicinity of biological organisms (birds) and recorded their acoustic communication (chatter). When the internal systemic entropy was reduced to a minimum, the brain stopped seeing that sound linearly. The signal has been decoded in real time as massive high-frequency data transmission.
- Author interpretation and system evaluation: Animal communication does not occur in words (relationship A leads to B), but in holographic data packages. Within 60 seconds, the observer detected and decoded dozens of lightning visual-spatial images (short videos) over real terrain, locations of houses and structures.
- Interpretation under TUS: The author connects his experience with the hypothesis local bird information networks in our reality: According to this hypothesis, birds could share information about terrain, locations, food or danger in real time. It's not about communication with other dimensions or universes. The record of experience remains a personal experience; the nature of any information transmission and the ability to decode it by man requires independent verification.
Anomaly II: Extra-body bypass filter (Perception in absolute observer mode)
- Induction: Temporary chemical paralysis of the brain's resting system (DMN) through natural psychedelic biosubstances (psilocybin fungi).
- Description of the phenomenon: The observer experienced a full ejection of conscious microfaith (soul) outside the boundaries of the 3D biological body. He watched himself and the interaction of the surrounding persons from the perspective (from an unspecified height of several meters) in a full spatial context, completely outside the optical limits of human eyes.
- Author interpretation and system evaluation: The key element of the anomaly was total absence of ego software and emotions. The observer perceived the situation with absolute systemic justice and purity, without harm, fear or personal assessment. The physical body was only perceived as a temporary biological avatar (robot) operating on the scene in real time.
- Correlation with TUS: This indicates that human ego and emotions are low-frequency programs recorded exclusively in 3D biological hardware (amygdala, hormones). Once the information unit is released into a higher dimension due to the bypass filter, it operates in pure consciousness mode. This condition corresponds to the perspective of highly developed system operators (angels).
Anomaly III: Data leak from previous iterations (Memory of past existence)
- Induction: Spontaneous fluctuation of the permeability of the biological filter during a quiet state of consciousness.
- Description of the phenomenon: The observer experienced an intense, 5 to 10 minutes-long internal feel, which showed all parameters of deep memory - a comprehensive video-fragment (sequence) from completely different space-time and historical scenes than its current avatar.
- Author interpretation and system evaluation: In the process of new system deployment, hardware formatting (the tablet race) takes place in order not to overload the new brain. In this case, however, the filter showed temporary microscopic permeability and occurred data leak uncompressed file from past iteration Information unit.
- Correlation with TUS: This phenomenon supports the hypothesis that data from old life cycles are not deleted by Universe, but remain permanently written in the Energy Information Code Information Units. These passages serve as deep directional clues for contemporary life and in a more subtle form they manifest themselves as exceptional talents or pre-installed "skins" in children.
Anomaly IV: Conscious regulation of the biosystem and transition phenomenon
- Induction: Targeted and conscious internal regulation of cardiac activity by force-trained will, independent of external pathological influences (disease, machine failure).
- Description of the phenomenon: For a moment, the observer knowingly stopped the heart function of the biosystem. Consciousness at this moment has neither gone out nor fallen into darkness. On the contrary - the consciousness remained fully preserved, showing extreme clarity, calm and independence from the collapsing pressure, because biological hardware as a whole still lived and maintained the information structure.
- Author interpretation and system evaluation: The experience is interpreted by the author as an experience with an extraordinary level of conscious regulation of the body condition. However, the record itself does not show complete arrest of circulation or independence of consciousness from the brain. The TUS derives from it a hypothesis of the relationship between consciousness and biological interface; the complete physical death and possible further existence of consciousness remain outside the scope of this observation.
- Correlation with TUS: Within the TUS experience motivates the model of consciousness as user of the biological interface. It's a hypothetical interpretation. The neurobiological model of consciousness and other possibilities are not refuted.
Conclusion of the Annex
The four records show which personal experiences contributed to part of TUS: unusual perceptions of communication in nature, altered states of consciousness and memory, and an experience of conscious bodily regulation. Together they motivate questions and hypotheses; they do not confirm them. The model's value therefore depends on its internal coherence, its ability to accept correction and its future comparison with independent findings.